Air cushion shoes are travel shoes

Today, Zheng Qingsheng still seems to be well-informed and still believes that “the case that the lawsuit eventually lost was Nike.” He also claimed that if he lost the case at home, he would continue to go to the United States to file a lawsuit.

The Nike company's reply today is basically the same as the previous ones. They believe that Zheng Qingsheng’s evidence is an excerpt from the website’s newspapers and publications and cannot be used as evidence at all. "He always said that he was playing a 'public welfare lawsuit', but in fact it was essentially a manifestation of the abuse of the right to appeal."

News Replay: In December 2004, the plaintiff Zheng Qingsheng thought that “the stability of the air-cushioned shoes when landing was poor, which could easily cause sprains on the ankles”. Nike’s promotion of the air-cushion shock absorber system was “the most important part of sports shoes” and other contents were suspected of pseudo-science. The fraudulent propaganda brought it to court. In November 2005, Xicheng Court rejected the Zheng Qingsheng lawsuit.